`Putting people's needs at the centre'
Users Declaration
General Considerations
The Global Information Society is in its infancy. Top priority must therefore
be given to measures encouraging its rapid development, which in turn will
contribute to economic growth, increased employment and improved access to
information for all.
The Information Society is not only characterised by a radical change in
technology, the most visible manifestation of which are Global Information
Networks, but also by its high potential to strengthen social and democratic
values. However, if this potential is really to be profited from,
“sovereignty in the Information Society must”, as stated by the
Information Society Forum, “belong to the people, their preferences
should determine its uses and how the new technologies will be applied”.
The readiness to accept the Information Society and to endorse and partake
the incontestable advantages it offers people depends therefore essentially
on whether citizens feel that their particular needs and interests are being
taken into account and met. In this context, new job opportunities are considered
essential.
Users are not homogenous. They range from individual private consumers to
large enterprises, and encompass a wide range of cultural diversity.
Consequently, users' needs vary and should not be treated as it they were
identical. One example may be individual users who are in a much weaker position
than large commercial consumers. If the Information Society is to be truly
inclusive these differences and especially the particular position of individual
users with respect to large commercial consumers must be taken into account.
Users should be the driving force in the development of Global Information
Networks.
The following statements will take into account user viewpoints by treating
specific issues rather than individual user groups.
Public policy should aim to eliminate the potential for social exclusion
and to ensure that all European citizens are able to enjoy the benefits of
the Information Society without threatening traditional social and cultural
values. As stated by the Information Society Forum: “Sovereignty in
the Information Society must belong to the people – their preferences
should determine its uses and how the new technologies will be applied.”
The positive potential of technology to overcome existing societal divisions'
needs to be seen as a priority for all parties involved. If this goal is
not pro-actively pursued the results could be highly detrimental in further
polarising the divisions within society.
Global Information Networks and their technological realisation have the
potential to create a more inclusive society based upon access to information.
Global Information Networks can enable marginalised groups - such as people
in remote areas, people with disabilities, people from ethnic minorities
- to participate more fully in everyday life through increased social contact,
training, and job opportunities available due to technological change. However,
this process needs to be fostered through positive action which ensures access
and training.
Users are well aware that public policy makers and industry have already
gone to great lengths in stimulating and developing the Information Society
and Global Information Networks. Currently, the technological side is leading
the process and stronger user participation is considered essential to bridge
the current gap and ensure successful deployment.
Users call for effective and accessible procedures to allow open, constructive
consultation between users, providers, the industry (including SME's) and
policy makers. It should be understood that users are in favour of further
development and are very interested in what is happening in the IS, but need
to be kept in touch with the process.
Promotional activities and projects geared towards specific user groups need
to be encouraged to overcome fears of users which mainly stem from lack of
information.
Innovation should equally be stimulated by financial encouragement, will
full exploration of all possible options.
There is a need to ensure that Information Society services are not only
available to a small privileged group, who will be able to afford them. In
the short term, the process should be encouraged by the development of public
access points in local communities, for example in public libraries.
The present drives to develop a concerted concept for Universal Service need
to take account of the rapid changes in technology and users' needs. Clearly
a more dynamic approach is required in light of the convergence of technologies.
There is a need for a much higher degree of standardisation and user friendliness
in the design of new services.
Official information from public authorities should be instantly available
electronically. The public right of access to official information should
besides be guaranteed by a legislation securing Freedom of Information. In
case government services are delivered electronically, non electronic-forms
of delivery of these services should be maintained. The model of a democratic
Information Society must also include a non-commercial area of information
aimed at improving the participation of the citizen.
It is vital that public authorities provide a favourable environment, which
by necessity should include a reliable legal and fiscal framework. This will
mean a European framework within which each National Government will be able
to adapt its regulation according to national priorities for building up
the confidence of the users and promoting the acceptance of the Information
Society. Governments and international organisations should agree on a series
of binding global principles.
Local and regional authorities are the prime government interface with citizens
and are key players in the fight against social exclusion, by also being
the experimentation and demonstration platform for public use of new technology.
Consequently, Information and Communication Technology cannot simply be regarded
as tools for improving “value for money” or the efficiency of public
administrations, but should rather be seen as opportunity for improving the
quality of living and working.
User information needs to be protected. This is a necessary prerequisite
if users are to feel confident and embrace the Information Society and must
include data protection at the workplace.
It is therefore essential to apply and specify the existing data protection
principles in particular in view of the threats arising out of the frightening
potential for misuse of digital traces left by the use of on-line services
and the collection of marketing data for instance by intelligent search agents
bringing together from thousands of Websites and Newsgroups all the available
information about an individual.
Individuals should exactly as in the off-line world have the right to preserve
their anonymity. Information should always be collected for a specific and
legitimate purpose, known and agreed upon by the persons concerned and
subsequently used only for aims not incompatible with the initial collection
purpose. Users should have the right to choose the cryptographic method and
cryptographic level most appropriate for their specific purpose.
The Industry should be encouraged to develop and use technologies and standards
which minimise the need for processing personal data by allowing to anonymise
the electronic traces wherever appropriate. In particular, anonymous payment
systems and identity protectors need to be offered. Secure systems of
transmission of data over networks must be available to the consumer at
affordable costs.
Strict ownership rules must apply to all providers of services regardless
of the transmission medium. Nevertheless, intellectual property rights should
not be used as a shield to engage in anti-competitive practices by blocking
access to public domain information. Within national boundaries no single
operator should be able to control considerable portions of the market (30
%) in which they operate. In this context, the market should be defined on
a functional basis (regional, national, etc.).
The content of Global Information Networks needs to be fostered. True value-added
content, reflecting the rich diversity of Europe, will not be created unless
the market demands and advocates it. The user and consumer must therefore
be made aware of the benefits, which can be drawn from these networks.
The citizens' rights to freedom of expression should be maintained when treating
content rules. Policy should ensure that existing general law is made applicable
to new information services. New rules where they are needed need to be flexible
and non-intrusive. The ethical responsibility for the content and quality
of information rests with content providers themselves and therefore must
be discussed with users in a detailed manner. The Industry should be encouraged
to develop filtering and blocking technologies to empower parents, teachers,
and others to block content that is inappropriate for children.
The current convergence of the market should be monitored carefully in order
to anticipate anti-competitive behaviour on the supplier side through timely
regulation. Action must be taken to avoid creating market conditions which
will lead to the monopolisation of the Information Society by some players
in the game.
There is clearly a need for a European framework within which each National
Governments will be able to formulate regulation adapted to national priorities.
Regulation is absolutely fundamental to creating lasting confidence among
users. Self-regulation should, where appropriate, be encouraged. It is critical
that this process is coupled with the need for protection of the individual.
Users and suppliers must become partners towards the same end. Simple
co-existence is not enough – one can not exists without the other.
Transparency of the process is therefore the key.
The changing world demands to meet the needs not only of those who are young
and still in school but increasingly lots of others who are older and need
to acquire new skills, but have little opportunity to do so through conventional
education and training systems. There is an urgent need to address the potential
job displacements, which may result from technological developments. Moreover,
people need to be sure that the labour market will offer ample and fulfilling
job opportunities in a fundamentally changed environment.
The primary guarantee for continued job opportunity is adequate qualification
of individuals. Priority must therefore be given to the creation of more
training and skill developing opportunities, permitting to use new and emerging
networks and technology. These efforts should be geared in such a way that
groups which find technology less appealing or even frightening are also
addressed. A proactive approach is needed towards equipping schools, and
vocational training systems, so that they have the capacity to play an active
part in building the Information Society.
There is a need to optimise the balance and complementarity between Commission
initiatives (in particular Structural Funds) and those of National Governments.
The challenge is to intervene in ways that can turn the present vicious circle
into a virtuous one of self-sustaining development, helping the transition
from the teacher-centred pedagogy of the past to genuinely learner-centred
activity.
The energy that many National Governments are putting in to help get their
schools 'on-line' is encouraging, but there's so very much to do! Perhaps
it's a time for radical measures! Reform of the Structural Funds might bring
appropriate levels of investment to the most important 'structure' of all,
the infrastructure through which our people learn to cope with their changing
world.
The lack of accountability by suppliers is still frightening many users and
inhibiting the more rapid diffusion and take-up of the electronic commerce
and the use of Global Information Networks in general. The virtual world
often makes the consumers feel as if they have nowhere to turn in case of
problems. Open and understandable redress and complaint systems are therefore
necessary to increase and maintain the confidence in the new environment.
Effective mechanisms must be determined and placed in a coherent framework.
Global Information Networks will only be able to realise their positive potential
when individuals realise the value-added these Networks can provide and have
confidence in them. The readiness to embark on electronic commerce but also
to employ any other technology application typical of the Information Society
depends crucially on the confidence of the users. Users' needs need to be
taken into account as a matter of urgency in this area and in particular
with regard to: advertising and marketing; contract terms; pricing and billing;
security of payments; security of information; complaints and redress mechanisms;
regulation and enforcement.
Putting People at the centre of the Information Society
Dialogue , Stimulation and Promotion
Affordability and Access
Public Authorities
Local and Regional Authorities
Security, Confidentiality & Data Protection
Intellectual Property and Media Pluralism
Reliability of Services and Information
Consumer Protection and Regulation based upon
an Effective Consultation Process
Education and Training
Redress and Complaints Mechanisms
Electronic Commerce
